tesa® 64911
Product Features
- High initial adhesion to LSE surfaces
- Highly conformable and gap filling
- Excellent converting properties
Product description
tesa® 64911 is a double-sided PE-foam tape. Its high performance adhesive enables for primerless bonding of LSE- and MSE surfaces. Developed for permanent mounting of similar and / or dissimilar plastic parts, tesa® 64911 has its main application in automotive module assembly such as park distance sensor bracket mounting. tesa® 64911 features especially:
- High initial adhesion to LSE surfaces
- Highly conformable and gap filling
- Excellent converting properties
Product details and specifications
Product Features
- High initial adhesion to LSE surfaces
- Highly conformable and gap filling
- Excellent converting properties
| Adhesive Type | synthetic rubber |
|---|---|
| Backing material | PE foam |
| Color | white |
| Color of liner | red |
| Liner Type | glassine |
| Thickness of liner | 71 µm |
| Total thickness | 1,100 |
| Weight of liner | 82 g/m² |
| Elongation at break | 254 % |
|---|---|
| Tensile strength | 16 |
| Adhesion to PP (initial) | 16 N/cm |
|---|---|
| Adhesion to Steel (initial) | 17 N/cm |
tesa® products prove their impressive quality day in, day out in demanding conditions and are regularly subjected to strict controls. All technical information and data above mentioned are provided to the best of our knowledge on the basis of our practical experience. They shall be considered as average values and are not appropriate for a specification. Therefore tesa SE can make no warranties, expressed or implied, including, but not limited to any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The user is responsible for determining whether the tesa® product is fit for a particular purpose and suitable for the user’s method of application. If you are in any doubt, our technical staff will be glad to support you.
Downloads
Download the files below for more technical details and information on this product.
Contact us
Product comparison
Last updated on Apr 16, 2024